The CDK4/6 inhibitor revolution - a game-changing era for breast cancer treatment.

Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibition in combination with endocrine therapy is the standard-of-care treatment for patients with advanced-stage hormone receptor-positive, HER2 non-amplified (HR+HER2-) breast cancer. These agents can also be administered as adjuvant therapy to patients with higher-risk early stage disease. Nonetheless, the clinical success of these agents has created several challenges, such as how to address acquired resistance, identifying which patients are most likely to benefit from therapy prior to treatment, and understanding the optimal timing of administration and sequencing of these agents. In this Review, we describe the rationale for targeting CDK4/6 in patients with breast cancer, including a summary of updated clinical evidence and how this should inform clinical practice. We also discuss ongoing research efforts that are attempting to address the various challenges created by the widespread implementation of these agents.

Successful continuance of CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment with palbociclib after abemaciclib-induced hepatotoxicity in breast cancer: a case report.

Abemaciclib, a cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor, causes severe hepatotoxicity, a severe adverse event associated with the loss of treatment opportunities. We report a case of liver injury (grade 4) during treatment with abemaciclib, in which the patient was switched to palbociclib and successfully treated with this CDK4/6 inhibitor. A 73-year-old woman with bone metastatic breast cancer (hormone-positive, HER2-negative) was treated with abemaciclib, fulvestrant, denosumab, and precipitated calcium carbonate with cholecalciferol and magnesium carbonate (pCCCM). On day 17, the patient developed skin rashes on her trunk and arms. On day 22, abemaciclib and pCCCM were discontinued due to drug eruption. Grade 3 aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and grade 4 alanine aminotransferase (ALT) levels increased on day 29. Therefore, fulvestrant and denosumab were suspended as the causes of severe hepatotoxicity, in addition to the two drugs suspected of causing the skin eruption. On day 43, AST and ALT levels did not improve, and the patient was referred to a hepatologist. The hepatologist diagnosed hepatotoxicity as a drug-induced liver injury through additional tests and interviews. Fulvestrant treatment was resumed on day 78, and palbociclib on day 92, and denosumab and pCCCM on day 134. On day 287, treatment with the CDK4/6 inhibitor was continued without evidence of liver dysfunction. This case suggests that rechallenge with palbociclib after severe liver injury with abemaciclib may allow for continued treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors.

CDK4/6 inhibition in hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer: Biological and clinical aspects.

A dysregulated cell division, one of the key hallmarks of cancer, results in uncontrolled cellular proliferation. This aberrant process, mediated by a dysregulated cell-cycle machinery and overactivation of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4 and 6, can potentially promote tumorigenesis. The clinical application of CDK 4/6 inhibitors, developed to inhibit cell-cycle progression, in the treatment regimens of breast cancer (BC) patients is expanding. Currently, three agents, ribociclib, palbociclib, and abemaciclib, are approved for treating patients with hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic BC. In addition, abemaciclib is FDA and EMA-approved for patients with hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative, node-positive, early BC at high risk of recurrence. Emerging data suggest potential anti-tumor effects beyond cell cycle arrest, providing novel insights into the agent's mechanisms of action. As a result, a broader application of the CDK4/6 inhibitors in patients with cancer is achieved, contributing to enhanced optimized treatment in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings. Herein, the immunomodulatory activities of CDK4/6 inhibitors, their impact on the cell's metabolic state, and the effect on the decision of the cell to undergo quiescence or senescence are discussed. Moreover, this review provides an update on clinical trial outcomes and the differences in the underlying mechanisms between the distinct CDK4/6 inhibitors.

CDK4/6 Inhibition With Lerociclib is a Potential Therapeutic Strategy for the Treatment of Pediatric Sarcomas.

BACKGROUND: Sarcomas are a heterogenous collection of bone and soft tissue tumors. The heterogeneity of these tumors makes it difficult to standardize treatment. CDK 4/6 inhibitors are a family of targeted agents which limit cell cycle progression and have been shown to be upregulated in sarcomas. In the current preclinical study, we evaluated the effects of lerociclib, a CDK4/6 inhibitor, on pediatric sarcomas in vitro and in 3D bioprinted tumors. METHODS: The effects of lerociclib on viability, proliferation, cell cycle, motility, and stemness were assessed in established sarcoma cell lines, U-2 OS and MG-63, as well as sarcoma patient-derived xenografts (PDXs). 3D printed biotumors of each of the U-2 OS, MG-63, and COA79 cells were utilized to study the effects of lerociclib on tumor growth ex vivo. RESULTS: CDK 4/6, as well as the intermediaries retinoblastoma protein (Rb) and phosphorylated Rb were identified as targets in the four sarcoma cell lines. Lerociclib treatment induced cell cycle arrest, decreased proliferation, motility, and stemness of sarcoma cells. Treatment with lerociclib decreased sarcoma cell viability in both traditional 2D culture as well as 3D bioprinted microtumors. CONCLUSIONS: Inhibition of CDK 4/6 activity with lerociclib was efficacious in traditional 2D sarcoma cell culture as well as in 3D bioprints. Lerociclib holds promise and warrants further investigation as a novel therapeutic strategy for management of these heterogenous groups of tumors.

First-line CDK4/6 inhibitor-based combinations for HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer: A Bayesian network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: International guidelines recommend cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i)-based first-line therapy for hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) advanced breast cancer (ABC). However, direct drug comparisons are lacking. We aimed to identify the most effective and safe therapy through network meta-analysis (NMA). METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and OpenGrey up to September 30, 2023. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing endocrine therapy alone or in combination with CDK4/6i as first-line endocrine treatment for HR+/HER2- ABC patients. The hazard ratios for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and relative risks for objective response rate and adverse events (AEs) were available in selected trials. We performed a Bayesian NMA following PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: Thirteen RCTs, involving 10 treatments, were included. Most studies were at low risk of bias. Regarding PFS, ribociclib+fulvestrant ranked first with a surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) of 85.0%, followed by dalpiciclib+nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor (NSAI) (SUCRA = 78.9%). Considering OS, the top three ranked treatments were ribociclib+fulvestrant (SUCRA = 94.1%), abemaciclib+NSAI (SUCRA = 69.9%), and ribociclib+NSAI (SUCRA = 68.5%). Out of four CDK4/6is, ribociclib minimized the grade 3/4 AEs, while dalpiciclib demonstrated the worst safety. Publication bias could not be ignored in our analyses, and the certainty of evidence was downgraded primarily due to imprecision. CONCLUSIONS: Ribociclib+fulvestrant probably represents the best option in a first-line setting. When combined with NSAI, dalpiciclib likely showed the best efficacy but the worst safety. Abemaciclib+NSAI and ribociclib+NSAI could also be promising treatments, while palbociclib presented inferiority. (PROSPERO Registration No. CRD42022370271).

[Prognostic model for assessing the human glioma cell malignancy grade based on MDM2, MELK, SOX2, CDK4, DR5 and OCT4 gene expression]. / Prognosticheskaya model' dlya otsenki stepeni zlokachestvennosti kul'tury kletok gliomy cheloveka na osnovanii issledovaniya ekspressii paneli genov MDM2, MELK, SOX2, CDK4, DR5 i OCT4.

Glioma cell cultures are used in basic researches of tumor processes, personalized medicine for selecting treatment regimens depending on individual characteristics of patients and pharmacology for assessing the effectiveness of chemotherapy. Suppression of glioma culture growth without reduction of malignancy grade is common. Drug cancellation may be followed by substitution of precursor cells by more malignant clones. Therefore, analysis of culture cell malignancy grade is important. In the future, intraoperative analysis of glioma cell malignancy grade can be used to select individual therapy. OBJECTIVE: We analyzed the relationship between expression of marker genes TUBB3, CD133, CDK4, CDK6, CIRBP, DR4, DR5, EGFR, FGFR, FSHR, GDNF, GFAP, L1CAM, LEF1, MAP2, MDM2, MELK, NANOG, NOTCH2, OCT4, OLIG2, PDGFRA, PDGFA, PDGFB and SOX2 and glioma cell malignancy grade, as well as created appropriate prognostic model. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We analyzed expression of 25 marker genes in 22 samples of human glioma cultures using quantitative real-time PCR. Statistical analysis was performed using the IBM SPSS Statistics 26.0 software. We used the Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Shapiro-Wilk tests to assess distribution normality. Nonparametric Jonckheere-Terpstra and Spearman tests were applied. RESULTS: We obtained a prognostic model for assessing the grade III and IV glioma cell malignancy based on expression of marker genes MDM2, MELK, SOX2, CDK4, DR5 and OCT4. Predictive accuracy was 83% (Akaike information criterion -55.125).

Targeting CBX3 with a Dual BET/PLK1 Inhibitor Enhances the Antitumor Efficacy of CDK4/6 Inhibitors in Prostate Cancer.

The development of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is a significant factor that reduces life expectancy among patients with prostate cancer. Previously, it is reported that CDK4/6 inhibitors can overcome the resistance of CRPC to BET inhibitors by destabilizing BRD4, suggesting that the combination of CDK4/6 inhibitors and BET inhibitors is a promising approach for treating CRPC. In this study, candidates that affect the combined antitumor effect of CDK4/6 inhibitors and BET inhibitors on CRPC is aimed to examine. The data demonstrates that CBX3 is abnormally upregulated in CDK4/6 inhibitors-resistant cells. CBX3 is almost positively correlated with the cell cycle in multiple malignancies and is downregulated by BET inhibitors. Mechanistically, it is showed that CBX3 is transcriptionally upregulated by BRD4 in CRPC cells. Moreover, it is demonstrated that CBX3 modulated the sensitivity of CRPC to CDK4/6 inhibitors by binding with RB1 to release E2F1. Furthermore, it is revealed that PLK1 phosphorylated CBX3 to enhance the interaction between RB1 and CBX3, and desensitize CRPC cells to CDK4/6 inhibitors. Given that BRD4 regulates CBX3 expression and PLK1 affects the binding between RB1 and CBX3, it is proposed that a dual BRD4/PLK1 inhibitor can increase the sensitivity of CRPC cells to CDK4/6 inhibitors partially through CBX3.

A new perspective on the proper timing of radiotherapy during CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy in patients with "bone-only" metastatic breast cancer.

The vast majority of hormone positive and HER2 negative advanced breast cancers can be controlled well by endocrine therapy combined with the groundbreaking use of CDK4/6 inhibitors in the metastatic first-line setting. Approximately 50%-60% of these patients have "bone-only" metastatic disease. In oligometastatic cases or if a certain number of uncontrolled lesions develop during the aforementioned therapy, ablative radiotherapy can be delivered or, in symptomatic cases, urgent irradiation is needed with palliative intent. To achieve the most effective results, parallel with good quality of life, the timing of radiotherapy must be determined precisely, taking into account that different cell cycles are involved during different treatment modalities; therefore, optimization of treatment schedules ensures longer and safer post-progression overall survival. The key question is whether the two treatment modalities are safe concurrently or whether they should be administered separately, and if so, what is the optimal sequence and why? This manuscript aims to answer this important question, with a focus on quality of life. Existing publications focus on safety and toxicity profiles, and efficacy is detailed only tangentially and minimally.

The promise of combining CDK4/6 inhibition with hormonal therapy in the first-line treatment setting for metastatic or recurrent endometrial adenocarcinoma.

Metastatic or recurrent endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the uterine corpus is often incurable with limited treatment options. First-line treatment often includes cytotoxic chemotherapy, which incurs significant toxicities for many patients. Endometrial cancer, specifically endometrioid cancer, is a hormone-sensitive disease and, while single-agent hormonal therapies have demonstrated clinical benefit, resistance to these agents often leads to the use of chemotherapy. There is a lack of approved endocrine treatment options in the metastatic setting for most recurrent endometrial cancers, representing an unmet clinical need. Emerging evidence suggests that hormonal therapy in combination with other targeted treatments, such as cyclin dependent kinase (CDK)4/6 inhibitors, is well tolerated and effective in select patient populations. We discuss the clinical evidence suggesting that the combination of CDK4/6 inhibitors and hormonal therapy has the potential to represent an important addition to the first-line treatment options for patients with low-grade advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer.

[Expert consensus on endocrine therapy of breast cancer (2023 edition)].

Endocrine therapy is the primary systemic therapy for hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, which runs through the whole process of treatment for early and metastatic breast cancer. The development of new endocrine agents and targeted drugs such as cyclin-dependent kinases 4/6(CDK4/6)inhibitors has improved outcome of patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer and changed the treatment landscape. The update of clinical research data provides more treatment options, calling for treatment optimization. Experts had a deep discussion around the hot topics on endocrine therapy of breast cancer, and formulated the'Expert consensus on endocrine therapy of breast cancer (2023 edition)'.This consensus is based on research data worldwide and clinical practice experience, with the aims of standardizing clinical diagnosis and optimizing treatment in neoadjuvant, adjuvant and metastatic setting of hormone receptor-positive breast cancer.

Efficacy and safety of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor in patients with advanced breast cancer: A real-world experience.

BACKGROUND: Cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) have been shown to improve progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in randomized control trials. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CDK4/6i in patients with advanced breast cancer (ABC) in a clinical setting. METHODS: Consecutive patients with ABC were treated between October 2019 and March 2023 at Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Taiwan. Patients who had received at least one dose of CDK4/6i were included in this retrospective study. The main outcome of this study was efficacy based on the treating physicians' assessments in terms of PFS, and overall survival (OS), as well as the factors associated with patient outcome. The secondary outcome was safety. RESULTS: A total of 85 patients were included in the analysis, with a mean age of 66.8 years. After a median follow-up of 16.1 months, the median PFS was 28.4 months (95% CI: 22.5-33.6) and the median OS could not yet be estimated. The most common adverse events (AE) were fatigue (50.8%), anorexia (45.9%), and leukopenia (44.7%). In multivariable analysis, treatment with CDK4/6i with any grade AE or response to treatment effect (CR/PR) was an independent predictor for longer PFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.11-0.68; HR = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.06-0.67; p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: CDK4/6i administered in a real-world setting exhibits a similar survival benefit with the clinical trials.

Dermatologic toxicities to inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinases CDK 4 and 6: An updated review for clinical practice.

Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors (palbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib) have revolutionized the treatment of metastatic breast carcinoma. They currently form the first-line treatment, in combination with endocrine agents, for the management of locally advanced or metastatic hormone receptor-positive (HR + ), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer, the largest subtype of breast carcinoma. CDK 4/6 inhibitors have shown comparable efficacy outcomes with predictable and manageable adverse events. In this setting, dermatologic toxicity appears to be relatively frequent, accounting for up to 15% of all reported adverse events. It is usually mild to moderate in intensity and does not normally constitute a dose-limiting toxicity. The range of dermatologic adverse events includes both non-specific entities (maculopapular rash, pruritus, alopecia) and more characteristic toxicities related to CDK4/6 inhibitors, such as vitiligo-like lesions or cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Finally, more severe or life-threatening skin reactions can occasionally occur. The main dermatologic manifestations associated with CDK4/6 inhibitors, as well as management thereof, are described in this comprehensive review.

Vitiligo-like lesions induced by cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor Palbociclib: a case report and literature review.

Endocrine therapy has played an essential role in hormone receptor-positive (HR+), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer. With the continuous development of endocrine targeting drugs, especially the emergence of selective cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK4/6) inhibitors, the overall survival time in patients with HR+HER2- advanced breast cancer has been greatly improved. Their adverse reactions also need more attention in response to the climbing number of CDK4/6 inhibitors. The common side effects of CDK4/6 inhibitors were hematological toxicity, diarrhea, and liver function damage. Skin toxicity related to CDK4/6 inhibitors was rare. We describe herein our preliminary observation of one HR+HER2- advanced metastatic breast cancer patient diagnosed with vitiligo-like lesions after 10 months of taking Palbociclib. Hoping to share our experience to increase the clinician awareness of this unusual adverse and contribute to the information in the literature.

FSIP1 enhances the therapeutic sensitivity to CDK4/6 inhibitors in triple-negative breast cancer patients by activating the Nanog pathway.

CDK4/6 inhibitors are routinely recommended agents for the treatment of advanced HR+HER2- breast cancer. However, their therapeutic effectiveness in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains controversial. Here, we observed that the expression level of fibrous sheath interacting protein 1 (FSIP1) could predict the treatment response of TNBC to CDK4/6 inhibitors. High FSIP1 expression level was related to a poor prognosis in TNBC, which was associated with the ability of FSIP1 to promote tumor cell proliferation. FSIP1 downregulation led to slowed tumor growth and reduced lung metastasis in TNBC. FSIP1 knockout caused cell cycle arrest at the G0/G1 phase and reduced treatment sensitivity to CDK4/6 inhibitors by inactivating the Nanog/CCND1/CDK4/6 pathway. FSIP1 could form a complex with Nanog, protecting it from ubiquitination and degradation, which may facilitate the rapid cell cycle transition from G0/G1 to S phase and exhibit enhanced sensitivity to CDK4/6 inhibitors. Our findings suggest that TNBC patients with high FSIP1 expression levels may be suitable candidates for CDK4/6 inhibitor treatment.

Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitors for Treatment of Hormone Receptor-Positive, ERBB2-Negative Breast Cancer: A Review.

Importance: Combination therapy with cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i: palbociclib, ribociclib, abemaciclib) and endocrine therapy (ET) has been a major advance for the treatment of hormone receptor-positive (HR+), ERBB2 (formerly HER2)-negative (ERBB2-) advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Observations: Randomized phase 3 studies demonstrated that the addition of CDK4/6i reduced the hazard risk of disease progression by approximately half compared with hormonal monotherapy (an aromatase inhibitor, tamoxifen, or fulvestrant) in the first-line (1L) and/or second-line (2L) setting. Hence, the US Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency approved 3 CDK4/6i, in both 1L and 2L settings. However, differences among the CDK4/6i regarding mechanisms of action, adverse effect profiles, and overall survival (OS) are emerging. Both abemaciclib and ribociclib have demonstrated efficacy in high-risk HR+ early breast cancer. While ET with or without CDK4/6i is accepted as standard treatment for persons with advanced HR+ ERBB2- metastatic breast cancer, several key issues remain. First, why are there discordances in OS in the metastatic setting and efficacy differences in the adjuvant setting? Additionally, apart from HR status, there are few biomarkers predictive of response to CDK4/6i plus ET, and these are not used routinely. Despite the clear OS advantage noted in the 1L and 2L metastatic setting with some CDK4/6i, a subset of patients with highly endocrine-sensitive disease do well with ET alone. Therefore, an unanswered question is whether some patients can postpone CDK4/6i until the 2L setting, particularly if financial toxicity is a concern. Finally, given the lack of endocrine responsiveness following progression on some CDK4/6i, strategies to optimally sequence treatment are needed. Conclusions and Relevance: Future research should focus on defining the role of each CDK4/6i in HR+ breast cancer and developing a biomarker-directed integration of these agents.

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors: existing and emerging differences.

The cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib are standard-of-care therapy for hormone receptor-positive advanced or metastatic breast cancer, based on randomized trials showing improved progression-free survival for all 3 drugs and overall survival for ribociclib and abemaciclib. Results in early breast cancer are discordant, with sustained improvement in invasive disease-free survival demonstrated for abemaciclib but not other CDK4/6 inhibitors to date. We review nonclinical studies exploring mechanistic differences between the drugs, the impact of continuous dosing on treatment effect, and translational research into potential resistance mechanisms and prognostic and predictive markers. We focus particularly on how emerging findings may help us understand similarities and differences between the available CDK4/6 inhibitors. Even at late-stage clinical development, there remains much to learn about how agents in this class exert their varying effects.

An Overview of the Roles of CDK4/6 Inhibitors in Metastatic Breast Cancer Elderly Patients.

Breast cancer is the most common type of cancer in women worldwide. Many studies indicate that breast cancer increases in elderly patients (≥70 years) and suggest that the higher cancer mortality in this population relative to that observed in younger women could be related to organ dysfunction, an advanced and delayed diagnosis, and other morbidities. Endocrine therapy (ET) represents the favorite treatment for patients affected by hormone receptor positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Unfortunately, half of these patients are resistant to ET. In recent years, new therapeutic options, such as orally highly selective inhibitors of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6), have been widely investigated in patients suffering from MBC with good outcomes. They are able to bypass resistance from hormonal therapy, by restoring hormone sensitivity and by delaying chemotherapeutic agent use. Thus, CDK4/6 inhibitors, combined with hormonal therapy, represent an alternative treatment for MBC. Unfortunately, the elderly population with MBC remains mostly excluded from clinical trials. Moreover, few data on the efficacy, safety, and short and longterm outcomes of therapies based on the combined treatment of ET and CDK4/6 inhibitors are available. This narrative review highlights the use of CDK 4/6 inhibitor-based therapy for MBC in elderly patients and suggests new therapeutic perspectives.

[Biological, preclinical and clinical aspects of the association between radiation therapy and CDK4/6 inhibitors]. / Aspects biologiques, précliniques et cliniques de l'association de radiothérapie et d'inhibiteur de CDK 4/6.

Several clinical studies have shown that CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) improve survival in patients with metastatic or locally advanced HR-positive, HER-2-negative breast cancer (BC). The aim of this review was to synthesize the biological, preclinical and clinical aspects of the treatment of BC with CDK4/6i, with a focus on the combination of CDK4/6i and radiotherapy. The DNA damage induced after exposure of cells to ionizing radiation activates control pathways that inhibit cell progression in the G1 and G2 phases and induce a transient delay in progression in the S phase. These checkpoints are in particular mediated by cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK) 4/6 activated by cyclin D1. Several preclinical studies have shown that CDK4/6i could be used as radiosensitizers in non-small cell lung cancer, medulloblastoma, brainstem glioma and breast cancer. CDK4/6 inhibition also protected against radiation-induced intestinal toxicities by inducing redistribution of quiescent intestinal progenitor cells, making them less radiosensitive. Clinical data on the combination of CDK inhibitors and radiotherapy for both locoregional and metastatic irradiation are based on retrospective data. Nevertheless, the most optimal therapeutic sequence would be radiotherapy followed by palbociclib. Pending prospective clinical trials, the concomitant combination of the two treatments should be done under close supervision.

Role of identified proteins in the proteome profiles of CDK4/6 inhibitor-resistant breast cancer cell lines.

Abemaciclib (Ab) and palbociclib (Pb) are CDK4/6 inhibitors used to cure advanced breast cancer (BC). However, acquired resistance is a major challenge. The molecular mechanisms and signature proteins of therapy resistance for Ab and Pb drugs need to be explored. Here we developed resistant cells for Ab and Pb drugs in MCF-7 cell lines and explored the mechanisms and signature proteins of therapy resistance in BC. Proteome profiling was performed using the label-free proteome-orbitrap-fusion-MS-MS technique. Gene ontology (GO)-terms, KEGG pathways and network analysis were performed for the proteome data. Drug-resistant cells showed increased drug tolerance, enhanced colony formation potential and an increased gap-healing tendency for the respective drug. Up-regulation of survival genes (BCL-2 and MCL-1) and down-regulation of apoptosis inducers were observed. Drug-resistance markers (MDR-1 and ABCG2 (BCRP)) along with ESR-1, CDK4, CDK6, and cyclin-D1 genes were up-regulated in resistant cells. A total of 237 and 239 proteins were found to be differentially expressed in the Ab and Pb-resistant cells, respectively. Down-regulated proteins induce apoptosis signalling and nucleotide metabolisms and restrict EGFR signalling; however, up-regulated proteins induce Erk, wnt-ß-catenin, VEGFR-PI3K-AKT, glucose transportation, and hypoxia signalling pathways and regulate hydrogen peroxide signalling pathways. The panel of identified proteins associated with these pathways might have characteristics of molecular signature and new drug targets for overcoming drug resistance in breast cancer.

Cost Effectiveness of CDK4/6 Inhibitors in the First-Line Treatment of HR+/HER2- Metastatic Breast Cancer in Postmenopausal Women in the USA.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors improve progression-free survival when combined with endocrine therapies in patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer. However, the comparative cost effectiveness of utilizing three US Food and Drug Administration-approved CDK4/6 inhibitors is unknown. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the cost effectiveness of individual CDK4/6 inhibitors (palbociclib, ribociclib, abemaciclib) with letrozole versus letrozole monotherapy in the first-line treatment of hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer in the USA. METHODS: We constructed a Markov-based decision-analytic model to evaluate the cost effectiveness of CDK4/6 inhibitors plus endocrine therapies over a 40-year lifetime from a third-party payer perspective. The model incorporated health states (progression-free disease, progressive disease, and death), major adverse events (neutropenia), and cancer-specific and all-cause mortality. Using clinical efficacy and quality-of-life scores (utility) data from clinical trials, we estimated quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios using Medicare charges reported in US dollars per 2022 valuation and a discount rate of 3% applied to costs and outcomes. We performed deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses to evaluate parametric and decision uncertainty. RESULTS: Compared to letrozole, the model estimated an increase of 5.72, 5.87, and 6.39 in QALYs and costs of $799,178, $788,168, and $741,102 in combining palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib plus letrozole, respectively. Palbociclib or ribociclib plus letrozole were dominated by abemaciclib plus letrozole. Compared with letrozole, abemaciclib plus letrozole resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $457,538 per QALY with an incremental cost of $553,621 and an incremental QALY gain of 1.21. The results were sensitive to the cost of abemaciclib, disease progression utility, and patients' age. CONCLUSIONS: At a willingness to pay of $100,000/QALY gained, our model predicts that combining CDK4/6 inhibitors plus letrozole is not cost effective with a marginal increase in QALYs at a high cost. Lowering the cost of these drugs or identifying patients who can receive maximal benefit from CDK4/6 inhibitors would improve the value of this regimen in patients.